Little help?
Apr. 23rd, 2007 11:59 amI'm trying to dumb downsimplify my reserch (Recoil decay tagging of Cs-112) for presenting to the general public (in this case, a royal bank of scotland manager), and I'm kind of defeated, because I don't know how ignorant the general public is about nuclear structure (My supervisor is even worse).
at preset my introduction reads:
It is presently of considerable interest in nuclear physics to study very exotic nuclei which lie very far from the valley of stability. These nuclei are difficult to produce and study experimentally, but recent developments in detectors has made this study possible.
Do I need to add:
exotic= containing may more or fewer neutrons than is normal for the element; unstable.
vally of stablitiy = the general trend for the relative number of neutrons and protons in a stable element.
unstable = radioactive.
Would it be better to drop "vally of stablitiy" in favor of somthig more literal ad descriptive?
Do you know what a isotope is?
at preset my introduction reads:
It is presently of considerable interest in nuclear physics to study very exotic nuclei which lie very far from the valley of stability. These nuclei are difficult to produce and study experimentally, but recent developments in detectors has made this study possible.
Do I need to add:
exotic= containing may more or fewer neutrons than is normal for the element; unstable.
vally of stablitiy = the general trend for the relative number of neutrons and protons in a stable element.
unstable = radioactive.
Would it be better to drop "vally of stablitiy" in favor of somthig more literal ad descriptive?
Do you know what a isotope is?
no subject
Date: 2007-04-23 11:11 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2007-04-23 11:16 am (UTC)valley of stability = best to clarify
exotic = probably won't matter, so no real need to clarify. If you feel it is intrical to the presentation best to clarify otherwise leave it like that.
Isotope = hmmm. I'd explain it once at the beginning. 'An isotope being an element with the same number of protons but differing numbers of neutrons, which alters the atomic mass' ? Something like that could help explain it
finally
Hobbit = shit
:)
no subject
Date: 2007-04-23 11:24 am (UTC)Isotope. Not only do I know what this means, but I also cannot wrest a single pun from it, and I've tried for five minutes. I fail.
no subject
Date: 2007-04-23 11:26 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2007-04-23 11:33 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2007-04-23 11:42 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2007-04-23 11:45 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2007-04-23 11:47 am (UTC)Valley of stability *might* work, but it could also use a little clarification as to what exactly it is.
exotic should be ok, as should unstable, which is a word that speaks for itself. If your boss doesn't understand unstable, he needs help.
Course, I could say that for most bosses.... but it's easily looked up in a dictionary, unlike the others. ;-)
no subject
Date: 2007-04-23 12:04 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2007-04-23 12:05 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2007-04-23 12:08 pm (UTC)Enjoy your life while you still have it
no subject
Date: 2007-04-23 12:11 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2007-04-23 12:26 pm (UTC)-jaw drop-
Not only did I not see that, I then set it up for you! The shame....
-tips hat to you-
-opens whiskey bottle of shame-
no subject
Date: 2007-04-23 12:36 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2007-04-23 01:05 pm (UTC)Hmm. Maybe refer to your stuff as unusual unstable isotopes? It should punch the correct star trek buttons.
or short-lived isotopes.
If you pan to use valley of stability, maybe a diagram.
Of course, your bank manager may not have done geography either...
no subject
Date: 2007-04-23 01:11 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2007-04-23 01:12 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2007-04-23 01:28 pm (UTC)I glossed over all that its for a poster competition, to teach us how to communicate with the general public.
The financial decision is who to give the prize money to. If I can convince him that he is clever and has understood Difficult Physics, it goes to me (probably).
The physics posters never win, because none of the judges understand them.
no subject
Date: 2007-04-24 06:53 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2007-04-26 12:05 am (UTC)